GTF first quarterly report - State of the VeloraDAO

*This report is split into two posts due to character limits

Post 1/2

Introduction

This document represents the first quarterly report we committed to presenting to the DAO as part of our role in the Velora Governance Task Force, with the goal of providing insight into the DAO’s overall state and participation.

To that end, we will begin by analyzing the starting point — the condition of the DAO prior to our full involvement in October 2024. We will then review an intermediate stage, from October 2024 to March 2025, during which we acted as delegates, and finally examine the period from April 2025 to the present, in our role as Governance Task Force. For each stage, we will highlight the evolution, activity levels, participation, and overall condition of the DAO.

In our comprehensive report titled Driving Protocol Success through Optimized Governance, published on November 10, 2024, we stated the following: ‘DAOs face significant challenges, such as lack of participation, apathy among token holders, organizational difficulties, and the tendency to become slow and inefficient structures, and ParaSwapDAO is no exception’. In that report, we conducted a detailed analysis of several DAO metrics, all of which revealed that the then-ParaSwapDAO was going through a period of very low activity—almost stagnation—with very few proposals or debates. Nearly all participation efforts were being driven by the Foundation and Laita, who were behind almost every initiative.

Let’s now look at concrete numbers and how they’ve evolved since then:

1.- Proposals

This metric is particularly relevant to us, as proposals are the lifeblood of a DAO. They reflect that community members are actively submitting governance initiatives, engaging in discussion, and ultimately putting them to a vote. This is the purest expression of a DAO: generating ideas, debating them, and collectively deciding on actions that will impact the DAO and/or the protocol.

Since the inception of the DAO until November 2024, a total of 68 proposals have been voted on over approximately three years, averaging 1.8 proposals per month, consistent with the scale of ParaSwap:

  • 2021 (November and December): 11 proposals - Average of 5.5 proposals per month
  • 2022: 22 proposals - Average of 2 proposals per month
  • 2023: 29 proposals (the year with the highest activity) - Average of 2.4 proposals per month
  • 2024 (until November): 6 proposals - Average of 0.6 proposals per month
  • From November 2024 to March 2025: 10 proposals - 2 proposals per month
  • From April 2025 to June 2026: 14 proposals - 4,66 proposals per month

Source: VeloraDAO governance dashboard developed by SEEDGov.

These metrics show that since our involvement in the DAO, during the period from November 2024 to March 2025—with an average of 2 proposals per month—the DAO quickly reversed the near-paralysis it had experienced during the earlier part of 2024, which averaged only 0.6 proposals per month. This shift brought proposal activity levels closer to those of 2023, which had been the DAO’s most active year to date, averaging 2.4 proposals per month.

Furthermore, since officially assuming our role as the Governance Task Force (GTF) in April 2025—and although we are still measuring a relatively short three-month period—these metrics have not only stabilized and solidified but have also shown meaningful growth, reaching an average of 4,66 proposals per month. This indicates that the DAO has firmly moved beyond the stagnation of the first three quarters of 2024 and is now experiencing a period of active and healthy governance.

2.- Voters

The number of individual voters (addresses) has steadily declined since the inception of the DAO:

  • First 10 votes: Average of 708 addresses
  • From November 2023 to October 2024: Average of 160 addresses
  • From November 2024 to March 2025: Average of 67 addresses
  • From April 2025 to June 2026: Average of 57 addresses

Source: VeloraDAO governance dashboard developed by SEEDGov.

These data reflect a common trend observed across many DAOs: a strong initial wave of participation from retail users who either purchased or received governance tokens via airdrops and were actively engaged in the early stages. However, over time, there is a sharp decline in the number of active governance addresses. This drop is driven by various factors, such as retail holder apathy, increasing token concentration in the hands of large investors, and the impact of token vesting unlocks, which typically benefit seed investors or early team members.

Despite this trend, since the approval of PIP-53 in October 2024, the number of active voting addresses has remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 50 and 88. This suggests that the previous decline has plateaued, giving way to a smaller yet more consistent and engaged participant base.

Combined with the data we later present on the concentration of voting power, this highlights a shift in the DAO’s participation model—from a highly atomized structure of direct involvement by many tokenholders with low voting power, to one where professional delegates now play a central role.

Many token holders have chosen either to step back from direct involvement or to delegate their voting power to experienced and dedicated delegates. While direct participation from token holders is positive and desirable, it has become increasingly rare in practice. In contrast, professional delegates have proven to offer a more balanced and stable governance approach, often bringing technical expertise, consistent involvement, and a long-term perspective—unlike individual holders who may be driven by short-term incentives.

This shift has been instrumental to the growth of VeloraDAO, enabled by the successful launch of the Delegate Program Trial Period and later the Delegate Incentive Program, which provided the foundation for a more professional and reliable delegation system. The effectiveness of this model is further reflected in the following section, where we analyze the sustained growth of voting power in the DAO’s decision-making process.

3.- VP (Voting Power - PSP Voter)

The amount of tokens used for voting has increased over time. Since the implementation of the PSP 2.0 system in February 2023:

  • First 10 DAO votes: Average voting power of nearly 76 million PSP
  • From November 2023 to October 2024: Average voting power of nearly 139 million PSP (83% increase)
  • From November 2024 to March 2025: Average voting power of nearly 325 million PSP (134% increase)
  • From April 2025 to June 2026: Average voting power of nearly 394 (21% increase)


Source: VeloraDAO governance dashboard developed by SEEDGov.

Voting PSP has shown a consistent upward trend since the DAO’s inception, with a noticeable dip in participation during Q1 2024 that was subsequently reversed. Since November 2024, PSP participation has recovered significantly, growing by over 130%, with further growth by over and additional 21% observed since we assumed our role as GTF in April 2025.

A closer look at the chart above, combined with that of Proposals Over Timeagregar marcador titulo anterior, not only confirms this exponential growth but also reveals four distinct phases in the DAO’s voting PSP participation.

  1. Phase 1 (November 2021 – February 2023):

    This early stage was marked by very low PSP participation, but high numbers of individual voters. This suggests that many retail users, each holding small amounts of tokens, were actively involved in governance, though total voting PSP remained low.

  2. Phase 2 (February 2023 – January 2024):

    A period of steady growth in voting PSP, increasing from around 55 million to 251 million. Combined with an increase in governance proposals, this indicates a DAO that was expanding in both activity and engagement.

  3. Phase 3 (January 2024 – October 2024):

    This phase reflects the previously discussed stagnation period. Both proposal activity and voting PSP sharply declined. This decline was not coincidental—the DAO’s inactivity led to growing apathy among token holders, creating a vicious cycle of disengagement.

  4. Phase 4 (November 2024 – Present):

    In this most recent phase, the DAO has experienced a strong resurgence, with record highs in both proposal activity and voting PSP. The prior vicious cycle has been replaced by a virtuous one: more proposals, deeper debate, and significantly higher PSP engagement in decision-making processes.

Likewise, from the observation of the VP per Proposal graph, it can be seen that the participating PSP shows an upward trend, from an average of 325M PSP in the period November 2024/March 2025, to an average of 394M PSP in the period April 2025/June 2025.

The observation of this graph also shows that the previous ceiling of PSP token participation in votes during 2024 —300 million PSP, which was a historical record until November of that year— has now become the floor of participation. Currently, a significantly higher presence of voting PSP can be observed, which is highly positive for the overall health of the DAO for multiple reasons:

  • Greater legitimacy and representativeness in decision-making.
  • Greater security and resilience against potential capture attempts or governance attacks.
  • Greater accountability, control and alignment of interests over the proposals debated and voted on.
  • Fostering engagement and a sense of community.
  • Community maturation key for the long-term stability and evolution of a DAO.
  • Attraction of new stakeholders that an increase new opportunities.

In short, the new floor of PSP participation not only improves the quality and legitimacy of decision-making, but also represents an institutional shield and a clear sign of the resilience and maturity the DAO has achieved.

4.- Concentration of Voting Power

This indicates that voting power has become concentrated among fewer individuals:

Status in November 2024:

  • 271 voters without voting power
  • 1,831 voters with voting power between 1,001 and 10,000 PSP
  • 977 voters between 10,001 and 100,000 PSP
  • 65 voters with more than 1 million PSP, representing 83% of the total voting power of the DAO.


Chart taken from our ‘**Driving Protocol Success through Optimized Governance post*

Current status:

  • 277 voters without voting power
  • 1,820 voters with voting power between 1,001 and 10,000 PSP
  • 986 voters between 10,001 and 100,000 PSP
  • 103 voters with more than 1 million PSP, representing 83% of the total voting power of the DAO.


Source: VeloraDAO governance dashboard developed by SEEDGov.

The voting power in the 0 to 100,000 PSP range has remained relatively stable. However, there has been a significant shift in the concentration of voting power among wallets holding over 1 million PSP: from 65 voters in November 2024 to 103 voters today—an increase of nearly 60%.

This change clearly reflects the positive impact and success of the Delegate Program, and shows a much healthier governance structure compared to the past. Previously, the DAO had lower overall PSP participation, meaning those 65 large, anonymous wallets effectively held control over governance. Today, by contrast, the 20 recognized delegates collectively hold 277 million PSP in voting power, a significant number, which is distributed among known, accountable actors with clear track records.

This means that today:

  • Much more PSP is actively voting, which dilutes the relative influence of large holders.
  • More wallets hold high VP, but that power is now spread across a broader base.
  • There are 16 delegates with 1M+ PSP each, all of them publicly identified, with visible voting records and clear accountability.
  • DAO security and resilience have improved, as the threshold for governance capture has increased.
  • Dynamic accountability: If a delegate misaligns with the DAO or protocol, tokenholders can revoke their delegated VP.

In short, we’ve moved from a small set of 65 anonymous, high-voting-power wallets to a more decentralized, professionalized, and transparent voting structure. This reinforces the DAO’s robustness and its capacity for long-term sustainability.

5.- Forum Activity

An equally important indicator of the DAO’s progress is the noticeable increase in both the activity and quality of discussions on the governance forum. While this may seem like a subjective observation, it becomes evident when reviewing current threads: there is a clear rise not only in the number of contributions but also in their depth and constructiveness.

We now see more thoughtful and well-rounded conversations, with extensive constructive feedback and actionable suggestions that often lead to revised proposals. These improved versions tend to reach Snapshot with greater clarity, robustness, and broader consensus than the initial drafts.

Regarding the substance and scope of the proposals recently debated and voted on, the DAO has achieved meaningful advancements, such as:

  • The approval of a stronger and more coherent PIP lifecycle framework that improves decision-making processes.
  • The automation of fee and gas refund calculations and distributions, previously done manually.
  • The creation of the Governance Task Force (GTF), functioning as a governance facilitator.
  • The institutionalisation of the delegate role, with over 20 delegates publicly introduced on the forum —most of whom are actively participating.
  • The establishment of the Velora Growth Committee (VGC).
  • The increase in the quorum required for proposals to pass.
  • The normalization of regular community calls to foster open discussion.

Altogether, these changes reflect a DAO that is entering a more mature and active phase, not only in terms of proposal volume but also in its quality and sophistication of governance discussion.

6.- PSP staking

In November 2024 there were 388M total PSPs in staking, distributed 353.6M on Ethereum and 34.3M on Optimism. A steady increase of PSP in staking was observed at that time in both Ethereum and Optimism.


Source: ParaSwap PSP 2.0 General Metrics.

The total unique stakers at that time was 4,836, and also showed a steady increase, which, while decreasing slightly in Ethereum, increases significantly in Optimism, with the total number of unique holders increasing over time. On Ethereum, in Epoch 22,unique holders were 2,303, while on Optimism were 2,533, an increase of 335%.

At present, six months later, during Epoch 32, it can be observed that the total PSP in staking amounts to 442.2M, distributed as 396.4M on Ethereum and 45.7M on Optimism, which shows a strong increase across all aspects.

The total amount of PSP in staking over these six months increased from 388M to 442.2M, that is, a 14% increase. If we break it down by chains, we see that on Ethereum it rose from 353.6M to 396.4M —a 12% increase— and on Optimism from 34.3M to 45.7M, representing an increase of nearly 33%.


Source: ParaSwap PSP 2.0 General Metrics

As for unique stakers, six months after the previously analyzed data, the total number of unique PSP stakers is 4,160, distributed as 2,069 on Ethereum and 2,071 on Optimism.

This means that the total number of unique stakers decreased from 4,836 to 4,160, a 14% drop. On Ethereum, the number went from 2,303 to 2,069, a decrease of 10%, while on Optimism it dropped from 2,533 to 2,071, representing an 18% decrease.

The combination of these figures —a 14% decrease in the number of unique stakers over recent months, along with a 14% increase in total PSP staked— confirms a broader trend observed across various protocol metrics: a decline in retail holder and voter participation, coupled with an increased concentration of PSP among fewer holders, who have also raised their level of governance engagement.

This is a warning sign that should not be overlooked. The DAO and the protocol must actively address this trend by developing strategies to reignite interest among retail users, encouraging them to acquire PSP, stake their tokens, and participate in governance —whether directly or by delegating their voting power. The ‘Road to Velora’ campaign, developed by Laita, is specifically designed to address one of these challenges, since a core element of the campaign aimed at boosting engagement and encouraging users to earn points is the promotion of PSP staking in the sePSP2 module. The first metrics reported by Laita already shows a strong progress and positive impact in this aspect, it will be very interesting to analyze the final metrics once the campaign concludes.

7.- DAO Structure

In November 2024, the DAO had a minimal structure:

  • GovCo was the only existing structure, centralized in nature, and had a relatively minor role: overseeing the Ethereum Fee Claimer wallet and executing the fee distribution and gas refund, as well as approving emergency proposals for PIP qualification.
  • The calculations for fee distribution and gas refunds were done manually, with the responsibility falling on the ParaSwap/Velora team. This not only added to their workload but also carried the latent risk of human error due to the manual nature of the process.
  • There were no other structures in place.
  • While Snapshot was enabled, there were no delegates formally introduced on the forum, nor were there any participating or reporting on their activity.
  • The DAO community was limited to the Paraswap team at the time and a few individual contributors acting without coordination.

By March 2024, the reality of the DAO had changed significantly:

From April to June 2025, even within a short period, this trend toward greater maturity and structuring of the DAO deepened:

3 Likes

Post 2/2

8.- DAO Activity

Regarding the actual activity developed within the DAO, we can highlight the following:

Between November 2024 and March 2025:

  • Three AMA / Community Calls over six month were held—a practice that did not exist before this period—on October 24, 2024, December 12, 2024, and February 27, 2025, all with strong attendance and held on Velora’s Official Discord.
  • PIP-56 was introduced and approved to implement the Project Miro roadmap — one of the most important and ambitious initiatives in the protocol’s history.
  • As part of the Project Miró upgrades of PIP-56, PEP-08 was discussed and approved, aimed to facilitate the migration for stakers from the soon-to-be-deprecated sePSP1 module to the sePSP2 module, without having to wait for the standard unstaking period.
  • PIP-59 was presented by Bybit, requesting the return of the fees collected by the protocol as a result of swaps executed by a hacker. It became one of the most heated and thoroughly debated proposals in the DAO’s history, sparking opposing views and a highly productive, respectful discussion. The vote concluded with an exceptionally narrow approval margin: 49.56% in favor and 49.54% against.
  • The Delegate Trial Program was launched and executed, institutionalizing the delegate role and onboarding 13 active delegates.
  • PIP-55 was introduced, discussed and approved, aiming to develop a mechanism to automate the calculation and distribution of fees and gas refunds — processes that, until then, had been carried out manually.
  • PIP-57 was discussed and approved, improving the PIP Lifecycle framework and the DAO’s overall decision-making process.
  • The PGWG was created and became operational.
  • The DIP was introduced and began its first 6-month cycle, which initially included 9 delegates.
  • PIP-60 was submitted and approved to expand the new token and its staking mechanism to the Base network, as part of the protocol’s multichain growth strategy.

Between April and June 2025:

  • Two more AMA / Community Calls were held: one on April 17, 2025 on Velora’s Discord, and one on June 13, 2025 via X Spaces on Velora’s official account.
  • The first proposals to automate the calculation and distribution of fees and gas refunds for Epoch 29 were successfully submitted, approved, and executed — marking a key milestone in the DAO’s automation and decentralization process.
  • The PGWG delivered its final work.
  • As a result of the above, the creation of the VGC was proposed and approved. We successfully led the candidate application process, the election of its members, and the onboarding of the selected members, who are now actively working.
  • Quorum was increased, enhancing DAO resilience by raising the threshold against potential capture attempts.
  • The Governance Task Force role was created, and we have the honor of serving in it for the first 12 months. Its primary mission is to facilitate governance operations, coordinate efforts across stakeholders, and strengthen the DAO, its structures, and decision-making processes. It also aims to enhance both the quantity and quality of debate — all with the goal of turning the DAO into a key driver of the protocol’s success.
  • Formalization of Laita as a DAO service provider to carry out marketing facilitation, infrastructure support, and developer assistance tasks, along with the presentation of regular activity updates in the forum to enhance transparency and accountability within the DAO.
  • In our role as DIP Program Manager, we introduced improvements to the program
  • As planned, reopened the application process after the first half of DIP-Cycle 1 concluded. This resulted in the onboarding of 5 new delegates during this period.
  • All delegate activity is measured and tracked, and all related payments are transparently reported on the forum with regular monthly updates for full visibility by the community.
  • GovCo was deprecated, saving the DAO $60,000 annually. Control over the multisig and the approval process for proposals under the PEP framework was decentralized.
  • A proposal to introduce a system of scheduled voting was thoroughly debated. Although it was not approved, the open discussion and final outcome clearly expressed the DAO’s current will on the matter, which is a healthy sign of governance maturity.

As a final point in our analysis of DAO activity, when reviewing the “Users” section of the forum and filtering by all-time history, we observe that when sorted by topics created and posts published, long-standing members who have been part of the DAO for years are now joined by newer participants who, despite their recent incorporation, are already among the most active users.

This includes our own team, which began contributing in May 2024 and became fully active around October/November. Despite the short time, we’ve already ranked among the top users. Scrolling further down, one can also see several other currently active delegates who joined the DAO from November 2024 onwards.

This clearly demonstrates the high level of current DAO engagement, with new contributors quickly rising to prominence among the most active members in the forum’s history.

9.- GTF Activity

Regarding the work specifically carried out or promoted by us since April 2025 in our role as Governance Task Force (GTF), we detail below the key activities:

  • DIP Program Manager: As Program Manager of the DIP —a function now integrated into the GTF role— we have tracked and assessed all delegate activity. We published monthly reports for March (early April), April, and May (presented on the first day of each following month), with the June report coming soon. All data has been compiled into public spreadsheets for full community oversight. We also created the necessary batches in the Main DAO Multisig to execute DIP payments. This transparency allows delegators to evaluate their delegate’s performance and decide whether to continue delegating to them. It also allows delegates to reflect on their activity and improve if needed. The goal is to promote more impactful and accountable participation.
  • DIP Parameter Refinement: Based on our experience, we refined the DIP parameters starting in June to better incentivize high-quality participation.
  • Reopening of DIP’s applications: As planned, we reopened DIP applications in June. As a result, 5 new delegates joined the program, and 2 others introduced themselves in the forum recently.
  • Velora Growth Committee (VGC): As active members of the VGC, we have coordinated with other committee members and taken on specific initiatives. We believe the committee is on the right path and expect to share updates with the community soon.
  • Proposals Promoted by SEEDGov:
    • We prepared the initial draft of the final work and proposal from the PGWG that established the VGC, finalized it with the group, and posted it to the forum and Snapshot for DAO approval.
    • We led the application, election and selection process for VGC members.
    • We held meetings and provided feedback to Laita for the preparation of PIP-64, which was approved by the DAO.
    • We co-authored PIP-66 with Laita, which deprecated the GovCo and decentralized its remaining functions. We are now leading the onboarding of new multisig signers as per the proposal.
  • Community Calls: We organised 2 community calls during the April–June quarter, already described above.
  • Expense Dashboard: We developed a public dashboard (to view it you must open an AirTable account and request access) tracking DAO spending —including delegates, service providers, etc.— as a transparency and accountability tool. The intention is to make it a living doc that evolves with the iteration and feedback from the community. A formal announcement will follow.
  • Governance Dashboard: We developed a governance dashboard that tracks metrics such as VP per proposal, unique voters, VP concentration, and more. It will also be formally presented in the coming days.
  • Support to Curia: We supported Curia in preparing, drafting and submitting PIP-65, ensuring full compliance with PIP-57 for proposals lifecycle requirements, including forum publication and Snapshot submission, thus complying with our responsibility in the support and curation of the proposals posted and submitted to vote so that complies with the corresponding requirements.
  • New Delegate Onboarding: We supported Beni in his onboarding as a Velora delegate. After expressing interest, we guided him through the process, assisted with documentation, answered questions, and ensured a smooth entry. He has since introduces himself in the forum as a delegate, created his snapshot profile, received VP and participated in his first Snapshot vote in PIP-66.
  • Activity Monitoring: Last but not least, we have conducted detailed monitoring of both the DAO’s and delegates’ activities. This has not only enabled the production of this report, but also allowed us to inform the community about the DAO’s history, evolution, and current state—an essential foundation for planning and developing future strategies.

10.- DAO Expenses

This section outlines the DAO’s expenses, broken down by category and amount, supported by publicly verifiable on-chain data that has been systematically organised to facilitate community oversight.

10.- a) Delegate Incentive Program (DIP)

As a preliminary note, it’s important to clarify that, as outlined in the program, payments to delegates are calculated retroactively: At the end of each month, delegate activity is assessed, the compensation in USD is determined, converted into PSP, and a 30-day vesting period is applied. As such, although the DIP began in March, first calculations were made in April, and first payments were executed in May.

Details below:

  • Month 1 – March 2025:

    Out of 9 participating delegates, 8 received incentives.

  • Month 2 – April 2025:

    All 9 delegates received compensation.

  • Month 3 – May 2025:

    8 out of 9 delegates received incentives.

    • Total monthly amount: $16,500
    • PSP equivalent: 911,600
    • Execution: First days of July
    • While outside of the GTF Q1 date (April–June), we include it here for transparency.
    • See performance results | See transactions *made in July 4 after the end of the quarter
    • Cumulative (Month 1 to 3): $55,000 | 3,287,560 PSP
    • This amount is 18.5% below the $67,500 budgeted for the first three months, representing $12,500 cost savings for the DAO.
  • Month 4 – June 2025:

    Following the reopening of applications, 14 delegates are now participating, of which 12 will receive incentives.

    • Total monthly amount: $22,500
    • PSP equivalent: 1,146,209
    • Execution: First days of August
    • See performance results | The transfer will be executed during the first days of August, complying with the 30-day vesting period.
    • Cumulative (Month 1 to 4): $77,500 | 4,433,769 PSP

Total DIP expenses executed in the April/June period

Here you can see the total amount of PSP paid to each delegate until June 30. By clicking on each bar, a menu appears showing the details of every individual payment, including the amount, year, month, the wallet from which the payment was made, and a link to the transaction hash.

And here is a pie chart showing the percentage of each delegate’s income received. Expanding it gives more details of each tx and filter by delegate.. Please login and request access to see it in detail.

These charts will be constantly updated as new payments are made.

*Note that this charts has now been updated to reflect the May DIP payments transferred in July, i.e. after the end of the April/June quarter

10.- b) Service Providers

This section outlines the payments made to the DAO’s four current service providers: Laita, Mimic, SEEDGov, and WakeUp Labs:

Laita

Laita was onboarded as a service provider through PIP-64, approved on May 19, 2025.

The proposal defined a $300,000 USD budget in ETH, to be invoiced after proposal execution, and per-epoch payments of $60,000 USD.

Payments made during the April–June period:

  • May 21: 125 WETH (equivalent to $300,000 USD)

  • June 9: 23.611 WETH (equivalent to $60,000 USD)

    Total for April–June: 148.611 WETH

  • July 9 (after the end of the quarter): 23.4138 WETH (equivalent to $60,000 USD)

Mimic

Mimic was initially engaged via PSP-IPΔ23, approved in December 2022.

Its current relationship with the DAO is governed by PIP-34, approved in June 2023, which provides for compensation equal to 2% of assets processed per epoch, with a cap of $5,000 USD.

Payments made during the April–June period:

  • April 14: 3 WETH

  • May 12: 1.23 WETH

  • June 9: 1.177 WETH

    Total for April–June: 6.407 WETH

  • July 9 (after the end of the quarter): 1.2839 WETH (equivalent to $3,263 USD)

SEEDGov - Governance Task Force

SEEDGov was incorporated as a service provider through PIP-62, approved in April 2025.

The proposal includes a budget consisting of:

  • A fixed payment of $10,000 USD per epoch, payable in ETH.
  • A quarterly performance amount equal to 1.5% of protocol revenue, with a cap of $15,000 USD per quarter, payable in PSP.

The following payments were made during the April–June period:

  • May 12: 3.897 WETH (equivalent to $10,000 USD)

  • June 9: 3.935 WETH (equivalent to $10,000 USD)

    Total accumulated for the April–June period: 7.832 WETH

  • July 4 (after the end of the quarter): 419,427 PSP 20 as performance amount for the first quarter period.

  • July 9 (after the end of the quarter): 3.9023 WETH (equivalent to $10,000 USD)

Wakeup Labs

Wakeup Labs was onboarded as a service provider through PIP-55, approved in December 2024.

The approved budget includes a fixed development cost of $25,400 USD, split into two parts (50% paid in ETH at kickoff and 50% paid in PSP upon final delivery) and a 0.75% fee on processed transactions per epoch, with a cap of $1,500 USD, which is included in each Snapshot proposal for epoch reward distribution and executed together with the rest of the distribution.

The following payments have been executed:

  • December 27, 2024: 3.8 WETH (50% upfront development payment).

  • May 9, 2025: 0.895 WETH (retroactive fee from the first reward automation epoch).

  • May 19, 2025: 0.338 WETH (epoch fee).

  • June 6, 2025: 654,639 PSP (final 50% of the final development payment).

  • June 16, 2025: 0.181 WETH (epoch fee).

    Total accumulated: 5.216 WETH and 654,639 PSP

Total service providers expenses executed until June 30

Here you can see the total amount of WETH and PSP paid to each service provider until June 30. By clicking on each bar, a menu appears showing the details of every individual payment, including the amount, year, month, the wallet from which the payment was made, and a link to the transaction hash.

And here is a pie chart showing the percentage of each service provider’s ETH received. Expanding it gives more details of each tx and filter by service provider.

These charts will be constantly updated as new payments are made.

*Note that this charts has now been updated to reflect the July payments transferred, i.e. after the end of the April/June quarter

10.- c) ParaSwap Growth Working Group (PGWG)

This temporary structure submitted its final outcome on April 10, 2025, which was approved by the DAO through PIP-63 on April 28. The proposal includes a retroactive payment to compensate its members for the work performed, with the exception of us, which expressly declined to receive such compensation.

This was a one-time payment, as the PGWG was dissolved after fulfilling its intended purpose:

10.- d) Velora Growth Committee (VGC)

This structure was created through PIP-63, approved on April 28, 2025, and provides for retroactive compensation to its members every three months. Following the conclusion of the member selection process on May 13, the structure became operational from that date and accordingly, the first payment will be calculated and processed in mid-August.

10.- e) GovCo

GovCo was deprecated through PIP-66, approved on June 28, resulting in an annual savings of $60,000 for the DAO—equivalent to $5,000 per month in total compensation, with $1,000 allocated to each of its five members.

PIP-66 includes a final payment to its members in recognition of the services provided up to Epoch 30, at which point the automation of reward calculation and distribution rendered the structure obsolete. This last and final payment will be executed in the coming days.

11.- Conclusion

We believe the DAO is showing very encouraging signs of participation, discussion quality, and overall governance maturity.

That said, we don’t see this as a final destination or the ideal state — quite the opposite. We are proud of the progress made in recent months, which is backed by consistently strong metrics and trends.

Our focus now is to reinforce and build upon this positive trajectory, so the DAO continues evolving toward greater maturity, structure, and efficiency — and ultimately fulfills its potential to become a key driver of protocol growth.

Accordingly, we hope this report serves not only as a formal deliverable, as committed in our role as the Governance Task Force, but also as a valuable resource for the entire Velora community. Our goal is for delegates, service providers, tokenholders, and all active stakeholders in the DAO to gain a clear understanding of where the DAO started, how it has evolved, and its current state. eflecting on its journey, identifying both strengths and weaknesses, and recognizing ongoing trends are essential to shaping future strategies. We aim for this analysis to help strengthen what works, address areas for improvement, and continue building a DAO that is increasingly robust, mature, and efficient. Because we believe that well-structured, transparent, and participatory governance is not an end in itself, but rather a means to a greater goal: to make the DAO a key driver in the success and growth of the Velora protocol.

6 Likes