PIP-66 - Deprecation of the Governance Committee

Thank you for facilitating this @SEEDGov. We’ve already expressed our support for this move in the TG delegate chat, but would like to add our thoughts on a few comments made here in this thread:

  • We disagree to some extent that delegates holding positions in other DAO structures like the VGC should be excluded as this does not really involve any decision making so there is little to no risk of “centralisation” in that sense. Plus, lowering the VP threshold is indeed a higher risk. But we are not against the idea for broader participation’s sake if a good enough threshold can be maintained.
  • If some delegates feel that they require remuneration to perform this duty, we either remove the delegate slots and just stick to Laita + service providers, or pass it to someone else who’s happy to do it (though within reason of a VP threshold). How would you even price signing once a month? $50? Seems highly unnecessary and somewhat greedy even.
  • Signing within 24hrs shouldn’t be an issue as long as signers are notified well in advance.
  • Signers should most definitely be vetted beforehand, but we’d assume any added signers should have a trusted standing in the DAO before being onboarded.
4 Likes