Taking into account feedback received from some delegates and stakeholders in regards this proposal, we believe it is necessary to make a clarification and express consistency with our activities since joining the DAO:
The administrative tasks that we, as the Governance Task Force, are proposing to take on as a result of the remarkable increase in the DAO’s activity that we have promoted, are not an end in itself, as its intended purpose is to have an impact on the growth of the Protocol, its activity, volume and revenue. In other words, organizing, structuring and professionalizing the DAO and attracting talent is not the endgame, but a necessary starting point and solid foundation for the DAO to provide real value and generate concrete impact for Protocol’s growth and success.
Our role has been — and will continue to deepen — with the sole objective of ensuring that the DAO has a tangible impact on the growth of the protocol and this has been our approach from the very beginning.
Our first major involvement with the DAO was the post, not coincidentally called ‘Driving Protocol Success through Optimized Governance’, which was a research and a comprehensive report on the state of the Protocol and the DAO towards mid to late 2024, and the path we the DAO should take to effectively make an impact on the growth and success of the Protocol.
It is with this objective in mind that we have taken the initiatives we have, in particular the formation of the ParaSwap Growth Working Group (PGWG), whose purpose is that ‘the DAO engage, collaborate and provide support with @Laita and ParaSwap @foundation in developing initiatives to support the growth of the ecosystem’ and ‘provide a framework for the DAO to execute the growth tasks that are identified and to follow the right path’.
The PGWG will be soon presenting its final work proposing the creation of a Growth Committee with a detailed framework, looking towards designing strategies for the growth of the Protocol. We as the Governance Task Force aim to have an important presence and participation (non-compensated) in this structure to coordinate its efforts and be the liaison with the other structures of the DAO, the Foundation, Laita and other stakeholders to avoid overlap and maximize its value.
Coincidentally, we have structured our payment proposal so that the amount of the performance payment depends solely on the protocol revenue, so that if the protocol revenue goes down, our payment will go down, and if the protocol revenue goes up, our payment will go up, but in that case setting a low cap (60,000usd/year).
In summary, we would like to reinforce once again that our task will continue to be to strengthen and professionalizing the DAO as a means, becoming the driving force for initiatives with concrete impact on the growth of the Protocol, its activity, and its revenue, and to be aligned with this, part of our payments will be tied to our success in achieving this.