PGov Delegate Platform

PIP-68 - Upgrade VeloraDAO’s space to Snapshot Pro

We voted For: We are voting for echoing community sentiment regarding preserving split-delegation as losing it would disrupt quorum and voter flexibility. Additionally, the cost is viewed as a trial and not much relative to get governance continuity. The extra Pro perks are also welcome (higher character limits, custom domain, advanced strategies)

Velora Contributors Program (VCP) - Cycle 2 Renewal

We voted For: We are in favor of renewing this program and are thankful for the feedback the Seed team added into their proposal.

Velora Treasury Management

We voted For: We are in favor of the proposed treasury management team and believe that Avantegarde is a great team to do this.

Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 34
Rewards distribution for Epoch 34

We voted For & For : This is in line with prior agreements the DAO has made and we continue the support for Rewards & Gas Refunds distributions, very similar reasoning to Epoch 29/30/31/32/33 votes.

[TEST] Test Proposal – oSnap Base Chain Integration Check

We voted For: In favor of the test vote, no issues.

PIP-71: VeloraDAO Sponsorship of Governance Day 2025 – Buenos Aires

We voted Sponsor Gov Day - Gold tier: We think the gold tier sponsorship is an appropriate value to cost option and the community seems to be largely in favor of this one as well.

PIP-72 - Liquidity Funding for Futarchy Experimentation in Velora Governance

We voted For: We are excited to test this out, and think the budget and scope for work is very reasonable. As commented prior, we think the measured rollout suggests the goal isn’t to overhaul governance overnight but to build confidence in futarchy’s usefulness. If the trial shows that markets provide meaningful foresight, Velora could position itself at the frontier of governance innovation.

Rewards distribution for Epoch 35
Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 35

We voted For & For: This is in line with prior agreements the DAO has made and we continue the support for Rewards & Gas Refunds distributions, very similar reasoning to Epoch 29/30/31/32/33/34 votes.

PIP-73 : VeloraDAO x Octav Partnership for Clear Treasury Reporting

We voted For: In favor of this partnership for treasury reporting. The cost is very reasonable and the deliverables ensure proper accountability.

Some more thoughts: PIP-73: VeloraDAO x Octav Partnership for Clear Treasury Reporting - #3 by PGov

Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 36
Rewards distribution for Epoch 36

We voted For & For : This is in line with prior agreements the DAO has made and we continue the support for Rewards & Gas Refunds distributions, very similar reasoning to Epoch 29 to 35 votes.

PIP-74: Discontinuing the Gas Refund Program

We voted For: In line with our forum support of this proposal. We think the Gas Refund program has done its job and should be counted on in the future as a continuous fee rebate.

1 Like

Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 37
Rewards distribution for Epoch 37

We voted For & For : This is in line with prior agreements the DAO has made and we continue the support for Rewards & Gas Refunds distributions, very similar reasoning to Epoch 29 to 36 votes.

PIP-75 - Fund request from a user claiming losses due to the March 2024 AugustusV6 vulnerability

We voted Against: While we feel sympathy towards the users’ losses, we believe making one time exceptions don’t make sense in this case.