Proposal: PIP-69 - Velora Treasury Management
Vote: For
Rationale: I support this proposal. It is time to have a more active management and the proposed path is reasonable to me.
Proposal: PIP-70 - Velora Contributors Program (VCP) - Cycle 2 Renewal
Vote: For
Rationale: I support this renewal proposal, and I’m ready to keep contributing in this next season.
Proposal: Rewards distribution for Epoch 34
Vote: For
Rationale: Operational vote for rewards distribution.
Proposal: Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 34
Vote: For
Rationale: Operational vote for gas refunds distribution.
Proposal: PIP-71: VeloraDAO Sponsorship of Governance Day 2025 – Buenos Aires
Vote: Abstain
Rationale: While Governance Day is a respected event in the DAO governance ecosystem, I was not convinced that sponsorship would provide a strong ROI or align clearly with VeloraDAO’s growth strategy. The benefits outlined—brand visibility, networking, and stage presence—are difficult to quantify in terms of measurable outcomes for the DAO.
Additionally, I want to echo the concerns raised by @laita regarding the operational logistics of managing a booth and representation on-site. These requirements introduce coordination overhead that may not justify the sponsorship cost, especially without clear evidence of tangible impact.
For these reasons, I chose to abstain rather than oppose, as I am supportive of exploring ecosystem presence initiatives but would prefer more concrete alignment with growth objectives and operational capacity.
Proposal: [ PIP-72 - Liquidity Funding for Futarchy Experimentation in Velora Governance](https://snapshot.box/#/s:paraswap-dao.eth/proposal/0xe260a3ef6ac3e39f38c1b2366cfb488dcd0b4dfeaf7125612ddeb9fa7e753821
Vote: For
Rationale: This is a low-cost, low-risk experiment worth running. The DAO isn’t spending funds; it’s providing temporary liquidity that will be repaid after the pilot, and the potential loss is minimal.
It’s a great opportunity to test futarchy as a governance signal, introduce new data-driven tools into Velora, and enhance community engagement — all without altering current processes or incurring additional costs.
Proposal: Rewards distribution for Epoch 35
Vote: For
Rationale: Operational vote for rewards distribution.
Proposal: Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 35
Vote: Not cast
Rationale: Missed the vote due to tighter voting window
Proposal: PIP-73 : VeloraDAO x Octav Partnership for Clear Treasury Reporting
Vote: For
Rationale: This proposal enhances Velora DAO’s treasury transparency and gives all the community enough information about the DAO’s financials.
Proposal: Rewards distribution for Epoch 36
Vote: For
Rationale: Operational vote for rewards distribution.
Proposal: Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 36
Vote: For
Rationale: Operational vote for gas refunds distribution.
Proposal: PIP-74: Discontinuing the Gas Refund Program
Vote: For
Rationale: I support this proposal. The workload required to promote this distribution outweighs the perceived benefits to users; it makes more sense not to proceed with it any longer.
Proposal: Rewards distribution for Epoch 37
Vote: For
Rationale: Operational vote for rewards distribution.
Proposal: Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 37
Vote: For
Rationale: Operational vote for gas refunds distribution.
Proposal: PIP-75 - Fund request from a user claiming losses due to the March 2024 AugustusV6 vulnerability
Vote: Against
Rationale: The reasoning can be found in this comment.