Proposal: PIP-69 - Velora Treasury Management
Vote: For
Rationale: We support PIP-69 as it establishes the Treasury Manager role. @Avantgarde is a natural fit for the initial mandate. It’s essential to start the treasury as soon as possible, and this is the first step toward making that happen.
–
Proposal: PIP-70 - Velora Contributors Program (VCP) - Cycle 2 Renewal
Vote: For
Rationale: We support the renewal of the VCP for Cycle 2. Cycle 1 showed clear results in boosting participation and governance quality. Building on that success, Cycle 2 introduces refinements that strengthen alignment, encourage meaningful contributions, and keep the program sustainable for the DAO.
Proposal: Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 34
Vote: For
Rationale: We aligned on the distribution values and cross-validated the data. We confirm that the proposed figures are accurate, and for that reason, we’re voting in favor of executing the Gas Refund distribution for Epoch 34.
Proposal: Rewards distribution for Epoch 34
Vote: For
Rationale: We’ve checked the distribution values and have cross-validated the data. We confirm that the proposed figures are accurate, and for that reason, we’re voting in favor of executing the rewards distribution for Epoch 34.
Proposal : [TEST] Test Proposal – oSnap Base Chain Integration Check
Vote: For
Rationale: Test Proposal to validate oSnap module and Sage wallet are correctly connected and functioning.
Proposal: PIP-71 – VeloraDAO Sponsorship of Governance Day 2025 – Buenos Aires
Vote: For – Gold Tier
Rationale: We vote Gold. Governance-focused events are highly relevant for Velora, and this tier provides visibility and partner interactions with measured spend. While outcomes are never guaranteed, the potential upside justifies the investment, especially if followed by a clear post-event report.
Proposal: PIP-72 - Liquidity Funding for Futarchy Experimentation in Velora Governance
Vote: FOR
Rationale: We support this futarchy pilot as a low-cost, high-learning experiment for VeloraDAO. Starting with $VLR price as the signal is a reasonable first step, and future iterations could expand to metrics like revenue or user activity.
Proposal: Rewards distribution for Epoch 35
Vote: For
Rationale: We’ve checked the distribution values and have cross-validated the data. We confirm that the proposed figures are accurate, and for that reason, we’re voting in favor of executing the rewards distribution for Epoch 35.
Proposal: Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 35
Vote: For
Rationale: We aligned on the distribution values and cross-validated the data. We confirm that the proposed figures are accurate, and for that reason, we’re voting in favor of executing the Gas Refund distribution for Epoch 35.
Proposal: PIP-73 : VeloraDAO x Octav Partnership for Clear Treasury Reporting
Vote: For
Rationale: We understand that SeedGov and the Treasury Manager should already be carrying out this work. However, since those involved believe this initiative could bring greater transparency, it seems like a reasonable use of funds.
Proposal: Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 36
Vote: For
Rationale: We aligned on the distribution values and cross-validated the data. We confirm that the proposed figures are accurate, and for that reason, we’re voting in favor of executing the Gas Refund distribution for Epoch 36.
Proposal: Rewards distribution for Epoch 36
Vote: For
Rationale: We’ve checked the distribution values and have cross-validated the data. We confirm that the proposed figures are accurate, and for that reason, we’re voting in favor of executing the rewards distribution for Epoch 36.
Proposal: PIP-74: Discontinuing the Gas Refund Program
Vote: FOR
Rationale: The data shows minimal participation and low financial impact, while the operational cost of maintaining the Gas Refund Program remains high. Discontinuing it is the most efficient path forward and allows VeloraDAO to focus resources on higher-value initiatives.
Proposal: Gas Refunds distribution for Epoch 37
Vote: For
Rationale: We aligned on the distribution values and cross-validated the data. We confirm that the proposed figures are accurate, and for that reason, we’re voting in favor of executing the Gas Refund distribution for Epoch 37.
Proposal: Rewards distribution for Epoch 37
Vote: For
Rationale: We’ve checked the distribution values and have cross-validated the data. We confirm that the proposed figures are accurate, and for that reason, we’re voting in favor of executing the rewards distribution for Epoch 37.
Proposal: PIP-75 - Fund request from a user claiming losses due to the March 2024 AugustusV6 vulnerability
Vote: Against
Rationale: The incident and compensation process were addressed in 2024 through a defined, time-bounded framework that has already concluded. Reopening individual reimbursements would set an unsustainable precedent and introduce unnecessary risk to DAO governance and the treasury.
Proposal: PIP-76: Governance Cost Rationalization and Operational Continuity
Vote: For
Rationale: Given current market conditions, this proposal is a necessary cost-alignment measure. It reduces non-core governance overhead while preserving runway for protocol maintenance, security, and product development.