Sharing my rationale for recent votes on Snapshot:
Proposal: PIP-69 - Velora Treasury Management
Vote: For
Rationale: I support establishing a professional Treasury Manager framework with defined scopes, mandates, and accountability measures. As noted in my forum comment, the operational parameters I suggested (transaction thresholds, risk limits, KPIs) would strengthen implementation.
While I vote FOR the framework itself, I must note that Avantgarde has delegated significant voting power to me, so I would abstain from any future vote specifically selecting the treasury management provider.
Proposal: PIP-70 - Velora Contributors Program (VCP) - Cycle 2 Renewal
Vote: For
Rationale: I support the VCP Cycle 2 renewal as it expands beyond traditional delegation to reward research, integrations, and analytical tools.
As detailed in my forum feedback, the Contributor Points system creates proper incentives while SEEDGov’s evaluator discretion prevents gaming. My suggestions around collaborative bonuses, and modified structures seem to have been taken into account.