The proposal’s goal is fine, and @Tane brings up some good questions that should be cleared up. Boosting $VLR liquidity is a solid idea too—I think about that a lot myself. But honestly, it feels like we’re putting time and resources into minor initiatives instead of tackling the real issue, which is fixing the token economy and actually driving token demand.
In a few recent proposals, we’ve spent a good chunk of our treasury on things that only indirectly help token utility, like PIP-67 Project Miro - Deployment of VLR on BSC and PIP-72 - Liquidity Funding for Futarchy Experimentation. And now we’re looking to put more capital into a new pool with incentives that won’t last.
Personally, I think the DAO should hold onto its resources and focus on initiatives that can make a bigger, long-term impact.