Thanks for taking the time to lay this out so clearly, this is a fair and thoughtful point.
I understand that it may have been perceived that way at certain points, but the staking and fee routing mechanisms were always introduced through governance and were not defined as fixed or guaranteed rights.
The intention here isn’t to permanently close off future changes, but to avoid hardcoding or implying any specific model at this stage, especially given how the previous one played out in practice.
The current scope is deliberately narrow because governance is being simplified to focus on structural decisions around the token. Any future proposals would need to fit within that scope and be grounded in how the system operates going forward.
Appreciate you raising this, it’s a useful clarification for the thread.