We’re broadly supportive of this proposal, improved treasury visibility is something the DAO clearly needs, and Octav’s structure seems well-suited for that.
As @Mehdi mentioned, it would be valuable to review an anonymized sample report or a demo dashboard before finalizing, just to better understand the actual quality and granularity of the analytics. That would help confirm that the service truly fits VeloraDAO’s operational requirements.
Additionally, since the current proposal excludes custom integrations, it would help to clarify how far the “basic” dashboard setup can go in practice. For instance, if the DAO expands to new chains or protocols, or wants to see different types of data, what kind of additional work and approximate cost should we expect for those future integrations? Ideally, we could compare similar services, but even without that, having a clear sense of potential upgrade costs would help the DAO plan more responsibly over the long term.