Mehdi - Delegate Platform

[Mehdi]

Proposal: PIP-63 - ParaSwap Growth Working Group Outcome - Velora Growth Framework (VGF) and Velora Growth Committee (VGC)
Vote: For
Rationale: Growth and marketing are critical needs, especially following the rebrand to VeloraDEX. I have analyzed all aspects of the proposal, with details available in the discussion here. Ultimately, I believe the working group is moving in the right direction.

@Mehdi

I’m supportive of the VGC and its proposed efforts. Why?

• We can learn from past programs to achieve better results that directly impact protocol growth and revenue.
• Some committee members now bring stronger qualifications and more experience.
• Paraswap/VeloraDEX’s marketing needs are still underserved, making the case for VGC more evident.
• The budgeting is fair, and the DAO retains the flexibility to adjust or discontinue funding if the efforts don’t prove beneficial.
• There is clear alignment between the Paraswap/VeloraDEX community, core team, and delegators — all are willing to collaborate toward making this a successful initiative.