We believe the situation is clear: the allegedly affected party has presented their arguments, and part of the Velora community has already expressed their views. There is no need for spam or unnecessary noise, and we will take action to prevent it.
In our role within the GTF, we will assess whether it is appropriate for us to move the proposal forward to a vote. To do so, and in order to comply with the current Lifecycle Proposals DAO framework, it will be necessary to draft and publish in the forum a proposal that meets all formal requirements in order to being able to be submitted for voting. This could set a precedent regarding the DAO’s opinion on claims like these.