I’m 100% For! The Real Yield in ETH is the main UVP! GRP is for user acquisition, not subsidising farmers & arbitragers.
I just left this comment on Discord: “I was looking onchain at the “against” voters and found that most are dumpers (Claim Week → Dump instantly). Some are connected and clearly coming from the same trader”. For instance, the first “Against” on the list 0x6eB8D6BcccEb84832725DcF792468Dd8ba088449 is a good example…
enerow prepared proposal and enerow voted for it. Thats all you need to know about paaraswap DAO system) With 44mil you don’t need DAO, don’t need discussion, just make proposal vote for it alone and you win)
There are 5 members on the GovCo, not only Enerow. If you ask me, I think that GovCo members should not vote but what I see is that the vote is winning even if we exclude his vote: 74M - 44M = 30M For > 20M Against, not to mention that most Against are like 4-5 traders behind those wallets
Are you going to implement new cap for this epoch or from next?
Changing cap for this epoch is totally unfair(for example I(and probably some others) will lose money, I would do less trades if I knew refund cap is 500$). Even in common law, new laws can not affect backwards… but it seams you do not care…
If you still decide to change cap for this epoch, at least give opportunity to unstake without freeze time. As you say let the “toxic liquidity” leave. Otherwise it will look like it was a trap. When we staked we had one rule, now rule will changed, freeze time should change also.
If somebody wants to leave, It does not matter for you when he leaves today or a month later…