Firstly, as other delegates have mentioned, the BSC chain shows a lot of inorganic activity. We can’t rely solely on this data, as it’s subject to manipulation. Personally, I rarely use BSC these days.
Moreover, there’s little conviction left to justify investing further engineering effort and resources into expanding on this chain.
While expanding services on BSC might help with getting listed on Binance, it’s typically the services—not the token—that benefit. Therefore, I don’t believe this strategy would significantly help us at this stage.
Beyond that, we should prioritize our resources to strengthen our presence on emerging, high-potential chains such as HyperEVM, Plasma Chain, MegaETH, Monad, and others.
Lastly, having POL (Protocol-Owned Liquidity) is a great idea—I proposed it earlier myself. However, it only makes sense if it’s used to deepen our token’s liquidity, enabling new investors to enter with minimal price impact or to meet the requirements of a VC liquidity audit.
Based on the above points, I am against the proposal.