# Positive Slippage Income

**URL:** <https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589>\
**Category:** Research and Discussion\
**Created:** [January 23, 2022, 3:58pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589 "2022-01-23T15:58:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![starny](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/starny/32/58_2.png) [@starny](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/starny)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2022, 9:53pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/21 "2022-02-05T21:53:11Z")

</div>

Definitly LP eth/psp and stable/psp !!!

Just keep CRV, CVX and APW!

This will result in a small buyback on the PSP and more liquidity for the protocol…

It is simply the right thing to do.

And it would be nice to know which other chains benefit from positive slippage… I only see ETH and BSC … what about Avalanche and Polygon ? And now fantom ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dseeker](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/dseeker/32/410_2.png) [@dseeker](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/dseeker)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2022, 4:26am UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/22 "2022-02-06T04:26:35Z")

</div>

Nice summary. I love the white listing idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cryptologycate](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/cryptologycate/32/107_2.png) [@cryptologycate](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/cryptologycate)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2022, 9:47pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/23 "2022-02-06T21:47:45Z")

</div>

we can use seth protocols function to i don’t know make a paraswap index (special)…  
also defi 1oo could be whitelisted

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![liu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a88e57/32.png) [@liu](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/liu)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2022, 10:29am UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/24 "2022-02-09T10:29:12Z")

</div>

滑点收益产生于用户，理应补偿给用户。这里有一个简单的办法来合理的利用。用滑点收益所得定期（每周/月）全部购买PSP，所得PSP的20%或其它比例分配给团队用作后续发展，剩余的设一个单独的奖励池，设一个周期（天/周/月）按用户花掉的gas费分掉周期内的PSP奖励。这样可以让PSP循环流动起来，让持有的人数越来越多，共识更强，更有竞争优势。

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miaki](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/miaki/32/157_2.png) [@Miaki](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/Miaki)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2022, 11:25am UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/25 "2022-02-09T11:25:40Z")

</div>

English translation :

Slippage benefits are generated by users and should be compensated to users. Here’s an easy way to take advantage of it wisely. Purchase all PSPs regularly (weekly/monthly) with the income from slippage profits. 20% of the PSPs obtained or other proportions will be allocated to the team for follow-up development, and the rest will be set up in a separate reward pool with a cycle (day/week/month). ) divides the PSP rewards in the cycle according to the gas fee spent by the user. In this way, the PSP can be circulated, and the number of people holding it will become more and more, the consensus will be stronger, and there will be more competitive advantages.

Thanks for your participation @liu but for a better global understanding, please keep the exchanges in English.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CZhead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ac8455/32.png) [@CZhead](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/CZhead)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2022, 7:21pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/26 "2022-02-09T19:21:46Z")

</div>

These are nice discussions, but I think we need to keep it simple, as predictable as possible and readable to users.

We have, imho, 3 obvious goal to pursue:

- increase ParaSwap’s volume
- increase value of $PSP by giving it more utility
- increase value of $PSP by giving it more underlying value

It is very risky to do anything at this stage which could lead to decrease our volumes, so I wouldn’t add any kind of tax atm. Let’s first focus on what we have.

We can still act on 2nd or 3rd point, either by helping to fund gas refund budget proposal (only for ppl who stack a significant amount of $PSP) or by helping to buy back CVX/CRV (or other kind of solid collateral). I would not choose LP as that would require gas and complex / frequent re-arbitrage to track the best rewards, convert them to other asset …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alegal200](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/alegal200/32/169_2.png) [@Alegal200](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/Alegal200)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2022, 8:57pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/27 "2022-02-12T20:57:13Z")

</div>

if we build a autoswaper contract , an a hacker would be able to send a corompus token and when the program sign the aprouval .he is able to siphon all tokens ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![starny](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/starny/32/58_2.png) [@starny](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/starny)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2022, 5:15pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/28 "2022-02-13T17:15:01Z")

</div>

It is not necessary to automate, if now we have a new important coins in large quantity, it is better to keep it

Paraswap’s treasury is mainly PSP … it is also necessary to be diversified

1. keep some coins (like Aave, CRV, CVX, …)

2. sell the other coins in stable

3. make a second proposal for the stable to buy differents coins to have a diversified treasury

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![starny](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/starny/32/58_2.png) [@starny](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/starny)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2022, 1:36pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/29 "2022-02-15T13:36:59Z")

</div>

Little update:

**wallet positive slippage v5 :**

`Ethereum :` [DeBank | Your DeFi wallet](https://debank.com/profile/0xb1720612d0131839dc489fcf20398ea925282fca)  
`polygon :` [DeBank | Your DeFi wallet](https://debank.com/profile/0x0C84cd406B8a4E07dF9a1B15ef348023a1DCD075)  
`avalanche :` [DeBank | Your DeFi wallet](https://debank.com/profile/0x1bf4c97384e7bdc609017305edb23fd28c13e76a)  
`bsc :` [DeBank | Your DeFi wallet](https://debank.com/profile/0xcbb65ad3e64f404b5411486e15561bfb645ce642)

**old wallet v4 :** [DeBank | Your DeFi wallet](https://debank.com/profile/0xbc147973709a9f8f25b5f45021cab1ea030d3885)  
(Fantom fees are redirected on this wallet atm)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tenzent](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/tenzent/32/38_2.png) [@Tenzent](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/Tenzent)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2022, 4:22pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/30 "2022-02-15T16:22:56Z")

</div>

> [@starny](#):
>
> **old wallet v4 :** [DeBank | Your DeFi wallet](https://debank.com/profile/0xbc147973709a9f8f25b5f45021cab1ea030d3885)  
> (Fantom fees are redirected on this wallet atm)

does this all belong to the DAO ? is there a link for v3, v2, v1 wallets?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![starny](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/gov.velora.xyz/starny/32/58_2.png) [@starny](https://gov.velora.xyz/u/starny)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2022, 4:45pm UTC](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589/31 "2022-02-15T16:45:25Z")

</div>

If we interpret @mounir’s messages, it seems that the wallet v4 belongs to the team (at least this is my deduction?)

For the other versions I will look (I will modify the message)

.

**EDIT/**

V1 contract: [ParaSwap V1 | 0x86969d29f5fd327e1009ba66072be22db6017cc6](https://etherscan.io/address/0x86969d29f5fd327e1009ba66072be22db6017cc6#readContract)

Positive slippage v1 wallet: [DeBank | Your DeFi wallet](https://debank.com/profile/0x6F52A45c54518E5726DfD76d6472CE4F8Cd3dc06)

V2 contract: [ParaSwap V2 | 0x9509665d015bfe3c77aa5ad6ca20c8afa1d98989](https://etherscan.io/address/0x9509665d015bfe3c77aa5ad6ca20c8afa1d98989)

Positive slippage v2 wallet: _same as V1_

V3 contract: [ParaSwap V3 | 0xf90e98f3d8dce44632e5020abf2e122e0f99dfab](https://etherscan.io/address/0xf90e98f3d8dce44632e5020abf2e122e0f99dfab)

Positive slippage v3 wallet: [DeBank | Your DeFi wallet](https://debank.com/profile/0x46598afd5f964350a2bf58053a5de39bff019d88)

.

Paraswap V1/2/3 contract are inactive since more than 100 day  
but possitive slippage wallet are still active

Mounir said that these wallets were there before the DAO, so these wallets belong to the team… ?  
Again: this is my interpretation.

That’s why the wallets are still active:

- buying PSP but also selling coins, transferring USDC / ETH etc…
- participation to votes

by the way @Tenzent, the V4 wallet positive slippage has already delegated to you

[Previous page](https://gov.velora.xyz/t/positive-slippage-income/589.md?page=1)
