So it seems.
The “temp check” is the last step at least 48 hours before a snapshot vote (also on discord usually) in the ParaSwap governance process.
Its purpose is to ensure that the entire community has had the opportunity to take part in the discussion and that all questions have been answered.
Thank you. We are looking forward to hear about Layer3 final proposal.
Proposal is now live for voting!
https://snapshot.org/#/paraswap-dao.eth/proposal/0x6948249a5077b4bd118d2ed70eb473173cdfc92a19e3d7ad7e8d6297e08c61af
As I provided assistance in publishing the vote I am abstaining from this vote to ensure full neutrality to the community while assisting with quorum
As usual, I had the wrong pool so I deleted the previous message.
I wanted to get your point of view on this quest. Your figures, to know if you are satisfied.
For my part, I’m dubious.
In 6 days, around 100 people have already unstake their invest. If we consider your figures, that’s between 5 and 10% of those who have completed the quest.
The figures show 100k TVL, so we’re right on target, although below your optimistic expectations if we consider that our well-known stakers are now on Optimism too.
So, have we made this quest for retention or just media visibility, that’s another debate.
I wonder about the relevance of your quests, just as some of you pointed out before they were carried out.
I’m not against this kind of marketing practice, but it should be as close as possible to our protocol. Staking for staking’s sake on Paraswap is a bit absurd in my opinion.
Although some might say that our stakers aren’t necessarily the ones doing the volume. But you have to keep volume in mind if you want to understand why we offer staking.
I look forward to receiving your figures, so that we can plan our future collaboration in the best possible way.
Have a nice day
!
No answers to my questions?
What a way to look at a partnership.
I’m still waiting to hear from you. Thank you