Hello,
You were already answered in your misplaced message here: PSP-PIPΔX: Proposal ParaSwap Fee Collector v2.1 - #8 by habib
I don’t see any problem regarding fairness or transparency in ParaSwap documentation which clearly depicts how ParaSwap fee structure is organized.
What you’re describing is a wording problem you’re feeling on furucombo side.
(I don’t thing there is any obligation to use same wording between dapps.).
I will be transparent, I don’t think your message is relevant on ParaSwap governance forum as it is not a problem regarding ParaSwap.
I hope you can explain your problem on furucombo side.